OFVGA response to the Cap & Trade Program Design Options

4 stars based on 48 reviews

Action on climate change is heating up in Ontario as the government is poised to make important changes to its environmental framework. These changes are in line with the recent high profile climate change talks on the world stage. Details of the program have now been unveiled. This article briefly outlines the key features and implications of the cap-and-trade program under the Bill and the Draft Regulations.

We provide a review of the proposed design options in our previous bulletin. Following the release of ontario cap and trade design options discussion paper, MOECC solicited comments from the public on the several options it had proposed. The province has also been meeting about cap-and-trade with over stakeholders, including industries, associations, environmental organizations, and labour groups. The recent release of the Bill and Draft Regulations builds on this momentum by revealing the details of the proposed cap-and-trade program.

The proposed Bill, which is currently in its second reading, aims to establish a framework for climate change-countering action in Ontario. Scope of cap-and-trade obligations. The sectors in which large industrials operate include iron and steel; petroleum refining; cement; hydrogen; beer; ammonia; nitric acid; lime; glass; ceramics; institutions such as universities and colleges; mining; base metal smelting; brick-making; carbon black; ethylene; propylene; magnesium production; mineral wool insulation; lubricants manufacturing; and styrene.

The proposed program commences on January 1, and would function in three-year compliance ontario cap and trade design options, the first of which would end on December 31, The GHG emissions limit for Capped Emitters would be roughly equivalent to the projected emissions for that year. Following this, this cap would decline between four and five per cent each year during the first compliance period.

Capped Emitters would be required to retire emissions credits in an amount equivalent to their actual emissions for each compliance period. To achieve compliance, Capped Emitters may therefore:. Under the Draft Regulations, if a Capped Emitter fails to submit all required send and receiving binary data web api allowances and credits before the applicable deadline, it will be prohibited from transferring emissions allowances or credits from its holding accounts into any other account other than ontario cap and trade design options compliance account.

In addition, the Bill provides that in the event of a shortfall, Capped Emitters will be required to submit additional emissions allowances in an amount equal to three times the shortfall, failing which they may be required to pay an amount equal to any emissions allowances it failed to submit, multiplied by the lowest bid price accepted at the most recent auction.

During the initial compliance period, most large industrial emitters would benefit from a free allocation of emissions credits. This is intended to assist industry members of trade-exposed industrial facilities with high carbon emissions transition into the new model, which the MOECC recognized are more susceptible to competition from international markets. Electricity generators, transmitters and distributors, natural gas distributors, petroleum product suppliers and certain other emitters cannot qualify for free allocations.

Those who do not receive free allowances will have the opportunity to purchase them in auctions run by the MOECC. The types of initiatives that may become eligible for funding are listed in Schedule 1 of the Bill could include those that reduce GHGs through the use of:. This funding will complement the recently announced Green Investment Fund. These projects would be undertaken in sectors that are not subject to the cap and would require proponents to demonstrate that the GHG reductions are real, additional, verified, unique, permanent, and enforceable.

Once created, emissions offsets will could also be tradable in the secondary market. Once implemented, this regional market will allow member states to hold joint auctions of emissions allowances and will ontario cap and trade design options cross-border trading of emissions allowances and offsets. A cap-and-trade system would create significant implications for businesses throughout the province, including the following:. These implications will have to be considered in the context of an evolving national conversation about climate change.

Starting February 25,the Draft Regulations are available for a 45 day public review and comment period. Stakeholders should stay alert for the release of the offset regulations, which are expected in the near future.

If you have any questions about this bulletin or if you would like further information about these matters, please contact the authors.

What is being proposed The proposed Bill, which is currently in its second reading, aims to establish a framework for climate change-countering action in Ontario.

Caps and options to achieve compliance The proposed program commences on January 1, and would function in three-year compliance periods, ontario cap and trade design options first of which would ontario cap and trade design options on December 31, To achieve compliance, Capped Emitters may therefore: Initial allocation of emissions allowances During the initial compliance period, most large ontario cap and trade design options emitters would benefit from a free allocation of emissions credits.

To calculate the free allocation, three factors would be taken into consideration: The types of initiatives that may become eligible for funding are listed in Schedule 1 of the Bill could include those that reduce GHGs through the use of: Implications for businesses Ontario cap and trade design options cap-and-trade system would create significant implications for businesses throughout the province, including the following: Capped Emitters will face significant compliance obligations and costs.

They will have ontario cap and trade design options develop strategies for mitigating emissions, obtaining and trading emissions allowances and credits, and hedging against compliance costs. Customers of Capped Emitters could expect increased prices that reflect the new prices of carbon. Innovators may be able to bring to market new emissions reduction technologies and offset projects that were previously uneconomical.

Financial stakeholders will need to understand the implications of the cap-and-trade system for credit and offset trading and carbon finance. New players will likely emerge to facilitate and implement from such transactions.

What to expect Starting February 25,the Draft Regulations are available for a 45 day public review and comment period. Related services Environment Climate Ontario cap and trade design options.

Binary options forecast app

  • Unterstutzung fur binare optionen

    Best boundary binary options brokers canada

  • Europe-bet introduces binary options trading through tradologic

    Real time stock options trading simulator free

Go with green binary option download delta 10 quick tips and!

  • What to be attentive about in trading with one touch binary options

    Binary options trading tax australia gov

  • 888 hedgestreet binary options

    Iar download binary options

  • Binary inverse and complement codes

    Daytrading steuern osterreich

Binary options brokers reviews binary signals advise

39 comments Forex market holiday hours 2017 dubai

Welche online broker nehmen paysafe

Send the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change a message today on this critical issue by using our easy form below or by emailing your own message directly to melissa. Call for a strong cap and trade program Send the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change a message today on this critical issue by using our easy form below or by emailing your own message directly to melissa.

We cannot afford to drag our feet any longer on climate action. Science is also recommending more aggressive targets. The carbon cap should be adjusted to reflect this more aggressive target.

Set the cap as upstream as possible at the source of extraction or importation of GHG pollution; 2. Broad coverage of all sectors and sources of GHG pollution with full auctioning of pollution permits; 3.

An annually decreasing cap to meet targets and a strong floor price with predictable increases; 4. Price protection for low income individuals and households; 5. Simple, transparent pricing system that does not include pollution offsets, or limits them to a small proportion of pollution reductions and ensures that they meet high standards; 6.

Cap and trade revenues should not go into general funds; 7. I am worried that the proposed cap does not cover a broad enough range of sectors to be effective and fair. The cap should be broadened to increase the scope of the program to cover other sectors. I am deeply concerned that the current proposal provides free pollution permits to almost all industries.

This would make the program less efficient and effective. For cap and trade to be effective, it must be designed so that polluters are forced to pay to pollute.

Industry exemptions and free permits have weakened the effectiveness of the European Union cap and trade systems. I implore you to say no to special interests looking for special deals. You can submit this letter as-is or change it to reflect your own priorities.

Your comment will be forwarded with the subject line 'Lets get this right: Cap and Trade not cap in hand', your name email and postal code to melissa. You will also be added to the GPO mailing list but can unsubscribe at any time.